ShapeShapeauthorShapechevroncrossShapeShapeShapeGrouphamburgerhomeGroupmagnifyShapeShapeShaperssShape

Choline - The Rediscovered Vitamin for Poultry

by 5m Editor
1 May 2002, at 12:00am

By H.A. Workel, Th. Keller, A. Reeve and A. Lauwaerts - Choline, formerly known as vitamin B4, has been rediscovered as an indispensable feed additive in poultry. Over the last 3 years more articles discussing the use of choline chloride have been published than in the previous ten. This article aims to summarise recent studies by INRA, France (1997) and the University of Illinois, USA (Emmert and Baker, 1997), as well as the outcome of some previously unpublished research programmes.

Choline - The Rediscovered Vitamin for Poultry - By H.A. Workel, Th. Keller, A. Reeve and A. Lauwaerts - Choline, formerly known as vitamin B4, has been rediscovered as an indispensable feed additive in poultry. Over the last 3 years more articles discussing the use of choline chloride have been published than in the previous ten. This article aims to summarise recent studies by INRA, France (1997) and the University of Illinois, USA (Emmert and Baker, 1997), as well as the outcome of some previously unpublished research programmes. The role of choline in the prevention of conditions such as perosis and liver enlargement in chicks is already well known. Choline was first isolated from ox bile ("chole" in Greek) in 1849. Its nutritional importance has been recognised since 1930 and it is now a common dietary supplement for animals and humans alike. Choline, as the chloride or other salts, such as citrate, is recognised as non-harmful.

In the Code of Federal Regulations (USA), paragraph 21CFR 182.8252, choline chloride is a so-called "Generally Recognised as Safe" product. In the European Union, choline chloride is mentioned as a permitted ingredient in babyfood, according to the Directive 91/321/EEG. Annison (1996) has recently summarised the nutritional roles of methionine, choline and betaine, and their inter-relationships. He clearly demonstrated that choline has essential metabolic functions for which neither betaine nor methionine can substitute.

These essential functions are:
  • as a constituent of phospholipids, i.e. it is essential in the building and maintenance of cell structure, as well as ensuring normal maturation of the cartilage matrix of bone, including the prevention of perosis in broilers;
  • in fat metabolism in the liver, i.e. utilisation and outward transport of fat, so preventing abnormal accumulation of fat within hepatocytes - so-called "fatty liver";
  • as a precursor for acetyl choline synthesis, the transmission agent for impulses along the sympathetic nervous system.
Choline has a further non-essential metabolic role, as a source of labile methyl groups. It is only in this role that betaine can substitute for choline. Both essential and non-essential requirements can readily be met by dietary supplementation with choline chloride.

Choline Chloride - Dietary Requirements of Broilers

Choline chloride is a common supplement to poultry feed. However, published dietary requirements are based on studies several decades old and there has been significant change both in feed formulation and bird performance since these requirements were established. Hence, recent studies have sought to re-establish the requirements for choline chloride supplementation of broiler diets.

Emmert and Baker (1997), using a choline-deficient basal diet, showed an almost linear response to incremental addition of choline chloride up to 1115 mg/kg feed in chicks from 10-22 days of age (Figure 1). Increasing choline chloride to 2000 mg/kg resulted in further weight gain improvements, but to a lesser extent. Levels in excess of this had no benefit. This study is of particular interest since the diet was treated to ensure inhibition of de novo choline synthesis. The growth responses were therefore directly related to the dietary choline chloride supplement, assumed to be 100 % bioavailable. The influence of natural choline and the uncertainty of the bioavailability of the latter were thus negated.

Another recent study (INRA, 1997) has examined the response to dietary choline chloride supplementation (0, 400, 800, 1600 mg/kg) in broilers grown to commercial weights with typical corn/soybean meal based diets. Feed conversion was maximised at the 800 ppm level, improving from 1.71 (no addition) to 1.66 kg feed/kg gain. At this level of supplementation starter and grower diets contained 2100 and 1900 mg/kg of choline chloride equivalent respectively. These concentrations are consistent both with the levels used in the trials of Emmert and Baker (1997) and an earlier INRA study (1987), and with the recommendation of Larbier and Leclerque (1982) to add 500-600 mg choline chlorid per kg feed.

The economics of these responses (using INRA; 1997 data) can be calculated thus:

  • 1000 kg of liveweight gain requires 1710 kg feed at a feed conversion rate of 1.71 (no added choline chloride)
  • 1000 kg of liveweight gain requires 1660 kg feed at a feed conversion rate of 1.66 (addition of 800 ppm choline chloride)
  • therefore 50 kg of feed is saved per ton of body weight gain by adding approximately 1.33 kg choline chloride (calculated as 100 %).

Choline Chloride - Dietary Requirements of Layers

Layers, like broilers, have an essential requirement for choline. A major use is in the formation of the phospholipid lecithin, a component of egg yolk. Current NRC recommendations for choline allowances in laying hens are 105 mg/day for white egg layers and 115 mg/day for those laying brown eggs. At feed intake levels of 100 and 110 g/day for the two types respectively, this implies a choline dietary concentration of approximately 1100 mg/kg.

A number of factors may influence a hen's requirement for choline, for instance age, feed intake and dietary crude protein or methionine levels. It is generally accepted that dietary requirement declines with age, possibly associated with an increasing feed intake. Methionine is the first limiting amino acid for egg production and, given the common function with choline in methyl group donation, interactions between the two nutrients may be anticipated.

Several trials have investigated these interactions (e.g. Parsons and Leeper, 1984; Keshavarz and Austic, 1985; Miles et al, 1986; Harms et al, 1990). Most authors agree that where diets are low in crude protein and/or marginal in total sulphur amino acids, responses to both methionine and choline supplementation occur. However, whilst both nutrients can increase egg production in these circumstances, only methionine appears to exert a positive influence on egg size (Keshavarz and Austic, 1985). Examination of egg yield data from these various methionine/choline response studies suggest small, but consistent responses to choline over and above those achieved by methionine (e.g. Harms et al., 1990; see Table 1). This may be interpreted as choline exerting a sparing effect on methionine use for methyl group supply. In the commercial scene with diets highly specified for methionine + cystine (e.g. 0.7 %), this implies a relatively low requirement for choline supplementation. Conversely, with lower M + C levels (0.53 %, NRC 1994) choline requirement will be higher. Harms et al. conclude from their work that in feeding hens at least cost, the requirement for metabolic methyl groups is best met from choline and that feeds should contain sufficient choline to provide 118 mg/hen/day.

At a feed intake of 100 g/day, a recommendation of 118 mg choline/day equates to a dietary requirement of 1180 mg/kg, similar to that advocated by NRC (1994). As these levels may be only slightly higher than those supplied by the raw materials in a typical commercial diet, there has been debate about the need for dietary supplementation with choline chloride. Supplementation may therefore be viewed as a precaution against variable availability of choline from natural sources. Commercial recommendations for the choline content of layers feed are in the range 1200-1400 mg/kg (e.g. Leeson and Summers, 1991). Assuming a background level of approximately 1000 mg/kg, this suggests the dietary supplementation with choline chloride should be in the range 250-500 mg/kg.

Choline - Natural Content of Feedstuffs

Standard choline chloride contents of feed ingredients, based on chemical analysis of crops, are given in NRC (1993) tables. However, it may be expected that variation in content of choline will occur due to variation in prevailing crop growth conditions, e. g. climate, cultivar, soil, location, fertiliser and spray regime etc. A recent comparison has been made of choline contents of selected feed raw materials with "book" (NRC, 1994) values (IEEB, 1997). The results, corrected to choline chloride equivalent, are summarised in Table 2 and significant differences between published and measured values are evident. However, chemically determined values give no indication of bioavailability of naturally occurring choline.

Emmert and Baker (1997) have estimated the bioavailability of choline naturally present in soybean, rapeseed and peanut meals, at 83, 24 and 76 % respectively. Whilst these figures clearly show the variation in bioavailability of the native choline in feed ingredients, they also illustrate the problem of referring to book values when formulating feeds. Rapeseed has a significantly higher choline content than soybean and peanut meals (6198 ppm versus 2218 and 1685 ppm respectively) but the availability is less than a third that of the others. This uncertainty of the availability of natural choline has been well documented. For example, in the study of Marcha and McMillan (1980), chicks fed a diet apparently sufficient in choline, based on chemical analysis, still showed significant growth responses to supplementary choline chloride.

Effect of Supplementation of Broiler Diets with Betaine and/or Choline There have been several statements published recently discussing the use of betaine as a replacement for choline chloride. Whilst acknowledging that betaine can replace choline for only one of its biological functions, the broad conclusion from these articles is that betaine can remove the need for supplementary choline chloride if the basal diet contains adequate natural choline. However, as stated above, the availability of natural choline is uncertain. Therefore, to be sure the essential requirement for choline is met, choline chloride should be added to the feed, irrespective of the possible attraction of using betaine for other reasons. This reason can't be the difference in hygroscopicity, mentioned in some articles, because this is more or less the same for both products.

The effect of supplementary betaine in chicks fed with graded levels of choline chloride has recently been studied by Emmert and Baker (1997). In these studies a choline free basal diet was used. Adding choline chloride had an almost linear effect on growth and feed conversion. The addition of betaine at a concentration of 500 mg/kg feed (equivalent to 591 mg CC/kg) to the basal diet and to diets containing approximately 570 mg choline chloride/kg feed had no effect at all on bird performance (Figure 2-4). This neatly illustrates that the essential requirement for choline must be met before responses to betaine can be expected.

The conclusions from the studies summarised in the present article are:

  • the figures of NRC tables for natural choline content of feed raw materials are not always valid and should therefore be used with caution
  • the bioavailability of naturally occurring choline varies widely between raw materials which, with variation in absolute levels, means the contribution to dietary concentration may be severely overestimated
  • choline is essential for certain metabolic processes and cannot be replaced by betaine for these functions
  • adequate choline supplementation will overcome the variation in raw material concentration, and the uncertainty of bioavailability, supplying both the essential and non-essential needs of the bird -
    the following supplementary levels of choline chloride (as 100 %) are recommended:
    - broilers - 500-800 ppm
    - layers - 250-500 ppm.

References

List of literature cited is available from authors.



Authors

H.A. Workel, Th. Keller, A. Reeve and A. Lauwaerts - Amersfoort (NL), Ludwigshafen (D), Cheshire (UK), Ghent (B) (*)
(*) Authors are members of theTechnical Committee of Choline Chloride group within CEFIC, Brussels. CEFIC is the umbrella organization of the European Chemical Industry. Questions or remarks should be sent to H.A.Workel.
Telefax: +31.33.4676017 or e-mail: hennie.workel@akzonobel.com

Originally Published: May 2002