US board reinstates thousands of USDA employees
Merit System Protection Board halts firing of USDA employeesA US board that reviews the firings of federal employees on Wednesday ordered the US Department of Agriculture to temporarily reinstate thousands of workers who lost their jobs as part of President Donald Trump's redundancies of the federal workforce, reported Reuters.
Cathy Harris, a member of the Merit System Protection Board, ordered the USDA to reinstate dismissed probationary employees for 45 days while a challenge to the terminations plays out.
The decision was issued a day after a federal judge blocked Trump from dismissing Harris, a Democrat, and from removing her from her position with the board without cause before her term expires in three years. The administration is appealing that decision.
"This is great news and needs to be done with all impacted agencies with similarly situated employees as fast as possible," said J. Ward Morrow, assistant general counsel at the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents some of the reinstated workers.
Tanya Torst, who was dismissed from the US Forest Service, a USDA agency, on 15 February, said she would be thrilled to return to her former job fundraising for a group of six national forests, though she worried about talk of shutting federal offices nationwide and of further staff reductions later this month.
"We're thrilled to come back, but we're hoping they have a place for us."
The USDA and White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump and Elon Musk, the architect of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, are spearheading an unprecedented effort to shrink the federal bureaucracy, including through job cuts.
It's estimated that more than 20,000 federal employees, almost all probationary workers, have lost their jobs and another 75,000 have taken a redundancy package, out of the 2.3 million federal civilian workforce. Probationary workers typically have less than a year of service in their current roles, although some are long-time federal workers.
Union efforts to contest the mass dismissals in federal court have faced procedural hurdles, with judges questioning whether unions had standing to bring the cases or finding that they should have been brought to administrative boards like the MSPB.
The merit board has proved to be a potential roadblock in the Trump administration's efforts to purge the federal workforce. The board hears appeals by federal government employees when they are dismissed or disciplined.
It has already halted the dismissal of six other such employees at various agencies at the request of a watchdog agency whose leader, Hampton Dellinger of the US Office of Special Counsel, was dismissed by Trump.
Dellinger, an appointee of Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, on Tuesday revealed that he had asked the board to halt the dismissal of thousands of USDA employees.
Dellinger argued that the Trump administration's dismissal of the probationary employees was done unlawfully and without regard to the workers' rights while circumventing regulations governing mass reductions in the federal workforce.
Harris agreed, saying she found reasonable grounds to believe that the agency dismissed them in violation of federal law. The board ordered all probationary USDA employees terminated since 13 February to be temporarily reinstated.
Dellinger, in a statement, welcomed the decision. He said his agency would continue investigating the dismissal of other federal probationary employees, and he called on federal agencies that had recently dismissed such workers to immediately reinstate them.
"Voluntarily rescinding these hasty and apparently unlawful personnel actions is the right thing to do and avoids the unnecessary wasting of taxpayer pounds," he said.
Trump removed Dellinger on 7 February, but he was reinstated by a judge until a Washington federal appeals court on Wednesday allowed Trump to dismiss him.
Dellinger told Reuters on Wednesday he was removed from his post shortly after the ruling, which is temporary while appeals court judges review the merits of the case.
---
Let me know if you need further refinements!